cOAlition S Researcher Survey
Towards Responsible PublishingcOAlition SCWTSResearch Consulting
  • Introduction to the survey
  • Sampling strategy and responses
  • Normalisation options
  • Survey
    • Demographic information
    • Recent publishing experience
    • Reaching relevant audiences and determining what research is pertinent
    • The efficiency of the publishing system, with a particular focus on peer review processes
      • Questions for respondents who have published preprints
      • Preprinting and open reviews by journals
    • Recognition and rewards
    • Recent peer review experience
    • Efficiency of peer review and effort recognition
    • Final thoughts
  • About the survey
    • Research team and acknowledgements
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Question 23
  • Question 24
  • Question 25
  • Question 26

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Survey

Efficiency of peer review and effort recognition

The following questions apply only to those respondents who have performed peer review in the past three years

PreviousRecent peer review experienceNextFinal thoughts

Last updated 11 months ago

Was this helpful?

Question 23

Do you feel that the amount of peer review requests you receive is


Question 24

Do you feel the current researcher recognition and reward mechanisms motivate you to undertake peer review?


Question 25

To what extent would the following practices encourage you to participate more actively in peer review?


Question 26

Publishing peer review reports may help to improve the efficiency of peer review. For example, if a journal rejects an article that is then submitted to a different journal, the latter journal may reuse (parts of) the previous review reports in its decision-making, thereby reducing the need to find new reviewers. As a reviewer, would you support the publication of your peer review reports?