Efficiency of peer review and effort recognition
The following questions apply only to those respondents who have performed peer review in the past three years
Question 23
Do you feel that the amount of peer review requests you receive is
Question 24
Do you feel the current researcher recognition and reward mechanisms motivate you to undertake peer review?
Question 25
To what extent would the following practices encourage you to participate more actively in peer review?
Question 26
Publishing peer review reports may help to improve the efficiency of peer review. For example, if a journal rejects an article that is then submitted to a different journal, the latter journal may reuse (parts of) the previous review reports in its decision-making, thereby reducing the need to find new reviewers. As a reviewer, would you support the publication of your peer review reports?
Last updated
Was this helpful?