Efficiency of peer review and effort recognition

The following questions apply only to those respondents who have performed peer review in the past three years

Question 23

Do you feel that the amount of peer review requests you receive is


Question 24

Do you feel the current researcher recognition and reward mechanisms motivate you to undertake peer review?


Question 25

To what extent would the following practices encourage you to participate more actively in peer review?


Question 26

Publishing peer review reports may help to improve the efficiency of peer review. For example, if a journal rejects an article that is then submitted to a different journal, the latter journal may reuse (parts of) the previous review reports in its decision-making, thereby reducing the need to find new reviewers. As a reviewer, would you support the publication of your peer review reports?

Last updated

Was this helpful?