cOAlition S Researcher Survey
Towards Responsible PublishingcOAlition SCWTSResearch Consulting
  • Introduction to the survey
  • Sampling strategy and responses
  • Normalisation options
  • Survey
    • Demographic information
    • Recent publishing experience
    • Reaching relevant audiences and determining what research is pertinent
    • The efficiency of the publishing system, with a particular focus on peer review processes
      • Questions for respondents who have published preprints
      • Preprinting and open reviews by journals
    • Recognition and rewards
    • Recent peer review experience
    • Efficiency of peer review and effort recognition
    • Final thoughts
  • About the survey
    • Research team and acknowledgements
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Research team
  • Acknowledgements

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. About the survey

Research team and acknowledgements

PreviousFinal thoughts

Last updated 9 months ago

Was this helpful?

The survey results presented in this interactive dashboard integrate the report ​​‘Towards Responsible Publishing’—Stakeholder consultation findings. Research Consulting and the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) conducted the study on behalf of cOAlition S.

In addition, the following information is available:

  • Report and Executive Summary:

  • Online researcher survey questionnaire

  • Online researcher survey dataset

  • Structured organisational feedback responses

A Kudos page with more project information is available at

Research team

Research Consulting

Andrea Chiarelli, Ellie Cox, Rob Johnson

Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University

André Brasil, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Ludo Waltman

Sheffield University

Stephen Pinfield

Acknowledgements

This project would not have been possible without the review, input, and critical advice we received from a broad range of individuals and organisations. In particular, we thank:

cOAlition S’ project group for the support provided over the course of this work, including: Bodo Stern (Chief of Strategic Initiatives, Howard Hughes Medical CentreInstitute; Chair of the TRP Steering Group, cOAlition S), Maria Karatzia (Communications Officer, cOAlition S), Nora Papp-Le Roy (Programme Manager, cOAlition S) and Robert Kiley (Head of Strategy, cOAlition S).

The project Steering Group for the insightful advice and commentary provided on our interim findings at multiple project milestones, including (in alphabetical order): Ashley Farley (Program Officer of Knowledge and Research Services, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), Bregt Saenen (Senior Policy Officer, Science Europe), Johan Rooryck (Executive Director, cOAlition S), Jeroen Sondervan (Programme Leader in Open Scholarly Communications, NWO), Marte Qvenild (Senior Advisor, Research Council of Norway), Katharina Rieck (Open Science Manager, Austrian Science Fund), and Zoée Ancion (Open Science Policy, French National Research Agency).

Our associates Joy Owango (Founding Director, Training Centre in Communication) and Lin Zhang (Professor of Information Management, Wuhan University) for their critical review of our findings as well as for the discussion of international implications of the TRP proposal.

The members of the research community and other stakeholders who generously volunteered their time, both anonymously, via online surveys, and as part of our focus groups.

We highlight that participation in the study by all respondents (regardless of the work package) does not imply their endorsement of the report’s findings or any commitment to the cOAlition S ‘Towards Responsible Publishing’ principles.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11243942
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11244210
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11244247
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11244266
https://doi.org/10.26303/m1s7-9b04
www.research-consulting.com
https://www.cwts.nl/
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/is